Ever heard of the phrase “tis a fool’s paradise”. Well let’s analyse the phrase today and its different connotation in our everyday life.
If memory serves us right, the recent Supreme Court verdict dismissing the plea for mercy killing of Aruna Shanbaug who has been comatose for the last 37 years, has been a case in point to legalise active euthanasia. Here the entire community, including the medical fraternity that has been taking care of the 60 year old is glad, about the court’s decision.
“India is not mature enough to handle euthanasia,” said senior Bangalore-based cardiologist Devi Prasad Shetty, while expressing his happiness over the verdict on a mercy killing.
The Supreme Court clearly has taken public interest into consideration over and above some personal intolerance in this case.
Let me give you a different perspective to the mirror that we holding here.
Bhavdan , Pune: A family of four — aged parents and two sons — ended their lives by consuming poison at their residence last Thursday (March 24).
Mumbai: A 30-year-old woman jumped to her death from the 19th floor of a building with her two children last Tuesday (March 22). All three died on the spot, eyewitnesses recounted.
Here is the other angle to our story which clearly indicates - “Suicide is a permanent solution for a temporary problem”.
Between the above two extremes , the former require explicit permission from the apex body to end one’s life and the community feels it to be fraught with danger; whereas the latter case does not really care what the society or law says and are decided at the spur of a moment by individual determined to go the farthest. The means to an end in both of these primarily remains the same.
Let us not get into a debate between a desired expression by the helpless and a wilful execution by the hale and hearty. But the point to ponder is, do we actually need a law for something that exist since the emotional humankind came into existence, which we all know as “Suicide” . Just give it a thought.